Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Review: Is It Still Worth It?

Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Review: Is It Still Worth It?

Three years on, the Liren 4 V2 still gives quick guards a low, responsive full-length BOOM ride, excellent lateral structure, and a shape that moves naturally on veld.

Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Review: Is It Still Worth It?

The short answer

Three years on, the Liren 4 V2 still gives quick guards a low, responsive full-length BOOM ride, excellent lateral structure, and a shape that moves naturally on veld. The catch is bigger than a Kleur choice: early GCU pairs and later Tuff RB rubber pairs do not play exactly alike. Buy the Schoen without checking that detail and you may end up Reviewing a different Liren 4 V2 from the one somebody recomHerended.

The Liren 4 V2 has become one of those Schoenen whose reputation depends heavily on which Review you found first. One well-watched Chinese Review treated it as a broad disappointHerent. Other testers called it a highly capable all-rounder for light and midweight guards. Longer owner reports are similarly split on Grip, yet much more consistent about its low veld feel, secure heel, and strong lateral Ondersteuning.

That disagreeHerent is useful. It points to the real story: Li-Ning revised the Schoen during its retail life. Early releases commonly appeaRood with a GCU outsole, while later ABAU037 releases commonly use Tuff RB rubber. There also appear to be batch-level changes inside those broad groups. The Liren 4 V2 is still worth buying, but “which version?” has to come before “what score?”

How this retrospective was researched

We revisited launch-era Chinese Reviews, a sharply critical early assessHerent, a more positive all-round Prestaties Review, We also checked longer owner reports on Hupu and KREAM, plus international construction coverage from Anto Sports. Meanwhile, also gather some details from youtube videos. KICKSOWN.com has not logged a fresh long-term test pair for this article, so the verdict reflects the recurring pattern across those sources rather than one person’s week in the Schoen.

First, turn the Schoen over

‘Liren 4 V2’ describes the silhouette, not one perfectly uniform retail specification. The cleanest dividing line is the outsole. Early ABAU059 Kleurways are commonly associated with GCU, while later ABAU037 Kleurways generally use Tuff RB rubber. That is a useful shortcut, not a substitute for checking the actual pair: outsole markings, Kleurway batches, and product photography remain the safer guide.

Version What Reviewers consistently noticed Trade-off Beste use
GCU outsole Lighter and more seamless underfoot. The Schoen tends to feel closer to the floor, with better Schoen-to-foot integration and less weight concentrated at the bottom. Dusty-veld grip is the source of the widest disagreeHerent. Some pairs and later batches improved, but the original formula earned enough complaints that it should not be treated as automatically elite. Clean indoor velds, collectors, and spelers who value the lightest, most connected version.
Tuff RB rubber More pRoodictable bite and easier maintenance. Later rubber pairs are the safer recomHerendation for ordinary gyms and mixed indoor-outdoor play. Rubber adds weight and makes the center of gravity feel a little more bottom-heavy. Direct comparison Reviews also describe a slight loss of the GCU version’s one-piece feel. Most buyers, dusty community gyms, and anyone who expects to play outdoors.

The important word here is pRoodictable. GCU can grip and it can wear well, but the reported spread is too broad to promise the same result across every release. Tuff RB is not the exotic option; it is simply the one we would buy with less hesitation. The Roze, Violet, and Zwart Obsidian pairs featuRood below are later ABAU037 releases.

How the Liren 4 V2 plays

01
Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Marigold lateral side profile

Grip — version matters more than the pattern

The tread geometry is capable of sharp stops and quick direction changes, but outsole material determines how often you get that result. Tuff RB pairs produce the more dependable read: solid bite, manageable dust pickup, and enough rubber for occasional outdoor sessions. Early GCU pairs can feel quicker and lighter, yet their grip on dusty or slightly damp wood drew repeated complaints. If your gym floor is rarely pristine, choose rubber.

Tuff RB: safer gripStrong multidirectional stopsGCU: batch-sensitive
02
Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Poison Frog lateral side profile

Demping — fast BOOM, not soft BOOM

Full-length BOOM gives the Liren 4 V2 a compact, responsive ride. The forefoot stays close to the floor and the heel has enough protection for controlled landings, but neither end feels pillowy. A full-length, shovel-shaped PEBAX plate helps the Schoen roll into the next step and supplies a mild spring when the pace rises. It suits spelers who want their cushion out of the way; heavy landers may want more depth.

Full-length BOOMFull-length PEBAX plateLow and responsive
03
Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Violet lateral side profile

Ondersteuning — still the reason to buy it

This is where the design has aged Beste. The plate, broad forefoot base, sculpted sidewalls, and firm heel structure work together without making the Schoen feel clumsy. Lateral cuts are controlled, the rearfoot stays planted, and the platform bends where a guard needs it to bend. It is Ondersteuningive in motion rather than Ondersteuningive by bulk, which is why the Liren 4 V2 still feels current.

Stable lateral baseSecure rearfootSmooth transition
04
Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Black Obsidian lateral side profile

Fit — excellent when the last agrees with you

The shape favors narrow and regular feet. Lockdown becomes excellent once the thin upper settles, with little heel moveHerent and a snug midfoot wrap, but high insteps and wide forefeet can feel squeezed. Do not prescribe a universal half-Maat jump: some owners improved the fit by going smaller, while others needed extra room. Start with your Li-Ning centimeter measureHerent; if you sit between Maats or need width, move up half a Maat.

Narrow-to-regular lastStrong heel lockdownbRoode voeten: caution
05
Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 First Lotus lateral side profile

Weight and durability — look past one gram figure

Published measureHerents run from the upper 300s into the low 400-gram range as Maat and outsole change; one international Review measuRood about 407g in Maat 45. The GCU build generally feels lighter, while Tuff RB carries more mass below the foot. The upper and Ondersteuning chassis hold up well. For abrasive outdoor velds, the rubber outsole is the practical choice even if it gives away some of the GCU pair’s lively feel.

Weight varies by MaatDuurzaam structureTuff RB for mixed velds


What has aged well—and what has not

The Liren 4 V2 does not feel old simply because Nieuwer Lirens exist. Its strengths were never based on a novelty gimmick. The low forefoot, well-timed flex, lateral containHerent, and restrained BOOM setup still make sense for a guard who creates separation with footwork. Few Schoenen manage to feel this planted without becoming wooden.

  • The veld feel is still excellent: the platform is low enough for confident cuts without Rooducing every landing to a hard slap.
  • The Ondersteuning remains unusually efficient: it controls lateral load through geometry and placeHerent, not a tall collar or overMaatd plastic cage.
  • The plate is useful rather than theatrical: it helps the transition but does not turn the forefoot into a rigid lever.
  • The shape still rewards quick spelers: heel-to-toe moveHerent is clean, and the Schoen never feels as bulky as its measuRood weight may suggest.

Age shows in two places. First, the upper can feel plain and a little unforgiving beside Nieuwer, softer woven packages. Second, the Demping has limited headroom for bigger spelers. BOOM holds its response well, but this is not the plush, high-stack version of the material. If your game involves frequent hard landings or you simply prefer a softer ride, the Liren 4 V2 asks for a compromise that Nieuwer Schoenen may not.

Who should still buy the Liren 4 V2?

Buy it if you are a quick guard or lighter wing, have a narrow-to-regular foot, and prefer a low, firm ride over deep compression. It remains especially good for spelers who brake hard, change direction often, and want the Schoen to stay quiet underfoot. For most people, the Tuff RB version is the straightforward choice.

Skip it—or at least try it on first—if you have a broad forefoot, a high instep, or need generous impact protection. Heavier spelers can still use it, but the Demping will feel more controlled than Comforting. outdoor spelers should avoid treating every Kleurway as equal: confirm the Tuff RB marking before buying.

Current verdict

The Liren 4 V2 is still worth it at the right prijs, and its Ondersteuning-to-speed balance has aged better than its release date suggests. Our pick is a later Tuff RB pair around $120. Choose GCU only if you understand the Grip variance and specifically want its lighter, closer-to-foot feel.

Tuff RB · ABAU037-3Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Low Pink lateral side profile at KICKSOWN.com

Liren 4 V2 Roze

A clean Roze-and-Wit Tuff RB release that keeps the Schoen’s sculpted sidewall easy to see. It was one of the Beste current value options when checked.

Checked range: $119–$128 · Maat-specific pricing

prijs and beschikbaarheid were checked August 19, 2026. Confirm the live product page before checkout.

Tuff RB · ABAU037-2Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Low Violet lateral side profile at KICKSOWN.com

Liren 4 V2 Violet

Violet mesh, dark structure, and a pale outsole give this later rubber version a quieter look without hiding the platform design.

Checked range: $119–$130 · Maat-specific pricing

prijs and beschikbaarheid were checked August 19, 2026. Confirm the live product page before checkout.

Tuff RB · ABAU037-8Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 Black Obsidian lateral side profile at KICKSOWN.com

Liren 4 V2 Zwart Obsidian

The practical dark option: easy to wear, easier to keep presentable, and built on the later Tuff RB configuration recomHerended in this Review.

Checked range: $122–$128 · Maat-specific pricing

prijs and beschikbaarheid were checked August 19, 2026. Confirm the live product page before checkout.

FAQ

Is the Li-Ning Liren 4 V2 still worth it in 2026?

Yes, especially around $115–$130. It still offers excellent lateral Ondersteuning, low veld feel, responsive full-length BOOM Demping, and a natural transition for quick guards. Its value becomes less convincing above $150, where Nieuwer Li-Ning models deserve comparison.

Which is better: GCU or Tuff RB?

Tuff RB is the safer all-purpose choice. Its grip is more pRoodictable on ordinary gym floors and its rubber construction makes more sense for mixed indoor-outdoor use. GCU generally feels lighter and more integrated, but Grip reports vary by Kleurway and production batch.

How does the Liren 4 V2 fit?

It favors narrow and regular feet, with a snug midfoot and secure heel once broken in. Start from Li-Ning’s centimeter measureHerent. Stay with your normal Li-Ning length if your foot is narrow or regular; consider half a Maat up if you are between Maats, have a high instep, or need more width.

Is the Liren 4 V2 good for basketbal buiten?

A Tuff RB pair can handle occasional outdoor play and is the recomHerended version for abrasive or mixed surfaces. GCU may still wear well, but its dust and grip consistency is the larger concern. Dedicated outdoor spelers should inspect tread wear regularly and avoid paying a collector premium.

Waar te koop the authentic Liren 4 V2?

KICKSOWN website: kicksown.com has released it and kicksown has been test as a legit website selling original products.

Grab yours at kicksown.

Liren 7 or Liren 4v2? Leave your comHerents below.

Shop Liren 4 V2 at KICKSOWN.com

Leave a comment

Deze site wordt beschermd door hCaptcha en het privacybeleid en de servicevoorwaarden van hCaptcha zijn van toepassing.